Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evie Dolan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evie Dolan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG based on sources in article and search of Newspapers.com. Most of the sources in the article are passing mentions and the only significant coverage is from questionable sources. Additionally, the only significant contributors to the page ([1]) appear to be users with conflicts of interest. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bands and musicians. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep while I agree that the article is poorly written, a Google search quickly reviews enough evidence to pass WP:SIGCOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributor892z (talk • contribs) 13:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Contributor892z: Could you specify which sources from Google would qualify as WP:SIGCOV for the subject? I cannot locate them in my search. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[2] and [3] anyone that was a teenage girl in 2015 knew about her. @Eagles247:Contributor892z (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Contributor892z: The first link includes one trivial mention of Dolan, which does not constitute significant coverage. The second link also includes one trivial mention in a BuzzFeed-style slideshow. It is also from the New York Post, which is considered generally unreliable per WP:NYPOST. Your assertion that "anyone that was a teenage girl in 2015 knew about her" does not hold weight per WP:IKNOWIT. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagles247: honest question: wouldn’t someone that was the recurring face of ads with international circulation targeting a sizeable cohort of the world population be notable? Contributor892z (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Contributor892z: Probably not, see WP:NACTOR for a rough guideline of how actor notability can be determined. Nothing about being the face of an ad campaign. And the role she had in School of Rock was minor, so it likely wouldn't count towards the "significant roles in multiple [...] stage performances" aspect of the guideline. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Kindly note that this editor, Contributor892z, is confused about what WP:SIGCOV entails as they think google hit search count toward that. Not sure from where they got this policy. For reference please see their response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penton Keah. FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Also unable to find significant coverage that goes into significant depth about the subject. At the moment the article reads like a simple résumé page, and it doesn't look like the subject has quite achieved notability just yet. InDimensional (talk) 14:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found only one of the articles which is broadwayworld.com to be proper for notability. We would need a few more like this. RolandSimon (talk) 21:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.