Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Sajovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 00:06, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Sajovic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well-intentioned product of an edit-a-thon. Sajovic has exhibited and published, which makes her a working artist and author, but does not make her notable in the Wikipedia sense of having attracted significant attention from the world at large. Between the cited sources and searches of the usual Google types, EBSCO, JSTOR, Project MUSE, and ProQuest, there are: brief announcements, capsule artist/author bios (likely supplied by her), one primary source interview with little or no independent analysis by the interviewer,[1] and one award of unclear significance - written about only by the awarding organization.[2]

Tagged for notability for 4 years, hasn't been shown to meet WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment an independent search found maybe two decent sources. I lean delete but await the opinion of others.Possibly (talk) 01:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Slovenian Wiki article a merely a paragraph big as well. Kolma8 (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV Dr42 (talk) 18:23, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - It seems that it is WP:TOOSOON for this interesting up-and-coming social practice artist/photographer. She has been awarded commissions and done projects at a few good institutions such as the Tate, so if some decent SIGCOV can be found, or a couple museum collections, I'm willing to change my !vote. If not, maybe in a few years her career will have developed enough to meet notability criteria for an article. Netherzone (talk) 20:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.