Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Ahuja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 17:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Ahuja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references to identify the topic. ЖunalForYou ^☎️^📝 15:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but when using her name and some WP:BEFORE the topic is easy to "identify". Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply nothing better and this has exited since Feruary 2011 so there was time for improvements. Pinging users who may be interested with this Yash!, Human3015, MichaelQSchmidt and AKS.9955. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the "ping". being neglected is a decent reason to tag for issues or even fix it yourself if so inclined, but a poor reason to delete. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alt using WP:INDAFD: ":Eva Ahuja"

Keep as the subject is sourcable and topic meets WP:ENT and WP:BASIC through WP:GNG. Sheesh. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has had significant roles in various notable television shows, thus satisfies criteria #1 of WP:NACTOR. Ya sh ! 05:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above arguments. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.