Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eudes Assis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eudes Assis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure that this chef is notable. I've tried to improve the translation and clean up the promotional language, but I'm not sure it meets WP:GNG. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 23:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - He seems to be quite the celebrity chef in Brazil: 1. TV appearance, 2. Folha de S. Paulo newspaper mentions him as "talented chef", 3. award from notable Brazilian food magazine, 4. appearance on the local food channel, 5. article in the Brazilian "Home and Garden" magazine, 6. another food channel appearance, and 7. this newspaper which says: "chef Eudes Assisi, an icon of Brazilian cuisine..". There seems a whole lot more of which I can't say how notable the sources are, such as this one. As chefs go, this one gets a lot of media attention. - Takeaway (talk) 22:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 18:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 00:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Several sources have been found. I'd say that this just passes notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.