Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Silence (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Source mods#Multiplayer mods. Sandstein 17:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eternal Silence (video game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this mod squeaks past WP:GNG. There's only one secondary WP:RS I found at Eurogamer. There's an interview at Gamasutra of the game's developers here, but that doesn't count as a secondary source. Besides that, references are slim at best and the current state of the article is original research. The game was apparently featured in a couple of magazines going by this post, but there is no way to access or translate them as they are in a different language. So while it is potentially notable, in this state there is little chance it will be expanded unless a concerted effort is made to track those down. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:28, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless those sources can be utilized. Balle010 (talk) 15:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Source mods as a WP:ATD. That Eurogamer reference is mostly poor, with little to zero info about the game itself. The interview is WP:PRIMARY, as the nominator said. I found PC Zone coverage (and twice) [1] [2], which still counts as 1 source only per WP:GNG. Given the fact I'm unable to find anything more, this can be perfectly preserved and then expanded accordingly at the mods list. Not enough for it's own article. Nothing to merge either, as the article is completely unsourced, and the list has already info about the subject. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.