Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eszter Tari
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 03:36, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Eszter Tari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I see no independent sources confirming that this individual meets the WP:ARTIST criteria. - Biruitorul Talk 16:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line 16:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot drop me a line 16:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Existing sources are of questionable reliability or independence. Per Biruitorul, no indication that the subject is notable. I tried a Google search on the subject's name but couldn't find any independent reliable sources. The article is the almost exclusive product of a single editor who appears to be a close associate of the subject. Richwales (talk · contribs) 22:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 22:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - concur with nominator and User:Richwales: lack of independent sources. --Noleander (talk) 00:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Some of the exhibit locations seem impressive. But without verification it is hard to know if what is listed is factual.SunRiddled (talk) 14:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.