Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estadio José Jorge Conte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, due to inadequate participation. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Estadio José Jorge Conte

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a good faith search, failed to find any references that were capable of satisfying WP:N or WP:SIGCOV. ManicSpider (talk) 11:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - a fairly major basketball team appears to have used it, but I don't know how notable basketball courts generally are. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- As with the others, does a "fairly major" team having used it make it notable without any reliable, significant coverage? And if so, under what policy? If it is the team that is notable, then perhaps it can be merged with their article. -ManicSpider (talk) 12:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"I don't know how notable basketball courts generally are" - hence the weak keep. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.