Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric astrology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Alice Bailey#Esoteric astrology. There's not strictly a consensus for the redirect, but WP:ATD argues for that in lieu of deletion. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Esoteric astrology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources for this article are three books of nonsense. There is no evidence that this subject is considered real or important even among the astrology community, who, FSM knows, have low enough standards. Guy (Help!) 09:13, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Redirect - doesn't seem to be any non-fringe coverage.I originally voted straight delete but redirect seems possible also per Revent. Blythwood (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Article was merged to Alice Bailey#Esoteric astrology in 2012, after discussion, and that article includes all the text that has not been removed as unencyclopedic. Restore the redirect. Revent^talk 20:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.