Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmeralda Rego de Jesus Araujo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Esmeralda Rego de Jesus Araujo

Esmeralda Rego de Jesus Araujo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not significant career for an encyclopedic entry. Nothing significant in coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 09:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the offline sourcing in the article appears to be strong enough to merit inclusion. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The sources seem to be passing mentions, not substantial coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Have you searched and looked for the offline coverage? Per WP:NPOSSIBLE this needs to be considered, and there is strong evidence already in the article that such coverage likely exists. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: article has plentiful sources, and googling for "Sister Esmeralda East Timor" shows more potential sources. Clearly notable. PamD 20:34, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per TonyBallioni, article passes V, NPOV, NOR, and NPOSSIBLE if not N. Smmurphy^(Talk) 18:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Passes WP:ANYBIO. I added and repaired some sources. Article should be expanded. She has had a notable impact in East Timor. Sources can be difficult to find because she has several names including Sister Esmeralda, Madre Esmeralda. Thsmi002 (talk) 04:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep meets the requirements for N with verifiability in multiple RS. ^{Atsme📞📧} 16:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Well cited with good sources. She might not have immediately passed notability if she was in an enormous country like China. However, in a small country like East Timor it's a different story and she's clearly made an impact. Scanlan (talk) 01:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.