Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmat Yahia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Esmat Yahia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the subject of this article might be notable as an academic, there are no reliable sources that demonstrate WP:GNG is met. Most of the provided "references" are either dead links or do not even mention subject of the article (based on a rough translation); those that mention the subject are passing mentions, which is insufficient for a biographical article. Contested PROD. Kinu ^t/_c 21:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did a bit of cleanup of the article and checked all of the links. None of the links in English had any mention of him, so the remaining links are all in Arabic, which I cannot check. There were two of the links that appeared to have photos of him. I can find no references. Note that there is an article for Higher_Institute_of_Ballet that includes his name as professor. One option would be to redirect to that page, and include the small amount of information about him on that page. (That page, too, needs considerable work and has no references.) LaMona (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:22, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Op47 (talk) 18:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.