Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escuela Digna Camilo Aguilar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pichilemu#Education. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Escuela Digna Camilo Aguilar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN kindergarten and primary school. Was tagged for notability. Tag was removed, by editor who asserted the school was notable. We don't generally provide stand-alone articles for such schools, absent a level of coverage not present here. Epeefleche (talk) 22:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom or better Redirect to Pichilemu as Kudpung suggests. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pichilemu#Education per long-standing precedent as documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES - which is simply a review of the facts as they are and neither a policy nor a guideline. Nevertheless, the 1000s of redirects in the 'R from School' cat are ample evidence alone of the way the community has generally agreed to treat such creations. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:47, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I see no argument gains a merge and redirect, merging just the basic data. I have never seen a valid argument for not doing so in a school, and the nominator does not offer one. The practical reason for doing them outside AfD is that they clog up the AfD process, and they are usually not controversial. If one is disputed, then we can deal with it. DGG ( talk ) 20:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's notability for a stand-alone article was controversial. As is reflected in the nomination, above. Epeefleche (talk) 02:45, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per DGG and Kudpung - As stated at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES primary schools get redirected (and very rarely merged). –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.