Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errr-Magazine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Errr-Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Original rationale was: No independent coverage; fails WP:GNG
. Rationale still stands. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
I created this article several years ago. This magazine was pretty popular in some circles. It appears in a couple of books that study new Mexican reading habits, more notably "Hacia una antropologia de los lectores [1] and "Estética" [2]. I think that should be enough to establish notability. If that's good enough, I'll update the article with them. -Solid Reign (talk) 20:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: User:Solid Reign, those two sources appear to contain trivial coverage of the subject at hand. To count towards establishing notability, sources need to have significant coverage of the subject. As I was unable to find any SIGCOV, I support deleting this article. HouseBlastertalk 21:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.