Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Er. Sanjeev Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 03:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Er. Sanjeev Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Possible COI.

Per WP:POLITICIAN: Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". —usernamekiran(talk) 21:28, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, I'd say there is sufficient coverage in media, see http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/rebellion-brewing-in-bihar-unit-of-youth-congress/1076400/ , http://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi-news/youth-cong-leader-pays-for-17-yr-old-fraud-case/story-0PIYpKeIn7TCYHjkgBD4EI.html , http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/man-disqualified-to-be-bihar-youth-congress-president-after-election/1/250074.html , http://www.bihartimes.in/Newsbihar/2013/Feb/newsbihar10Feb2.html , See also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaLPbGH-P-Y --Soman (talk) 22:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete political figures will inevitably get passing media coverage. The coverage here is not to the level to show notability for a politician so we should delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Minimal RS coverage, doesn't appear to meet GNG under WP:POLITICIAN. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.