Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Episode 1 Ventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Episode_1_Ventures

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete A run-of-the-mill VC company with no indications of notability in their own right. While they may have invested in several well-known firms, notability is not inherited and this article is little more than a platform to promote their services, failing WP:SPIP. None of the references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND Misterpottery (talk) 07:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:12, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:12, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:12, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:25, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. Just a directory listing. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Strikerforce^Talk 20:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not at all impressed with the sourcing, routine. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 04:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Much of the article text is about the previous activities of people involved in this fund, from which it does not gain notability. Nor do routine announcements of start-ups gaining funding from sources including this fund show more than a firm going about its business. I am not seeing sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH; as a vehicle for public and private money, the mention at Enterprise Capital Fund is sufficient. AllyD (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and others before me. Not too much new insight that I'm able to add here. Strikerforce^Talk 15:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete abundance of sources but none strong enough to keep it. Dial911 (talk) 03:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.