Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ensemble Therapeutics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 10:55, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ensemble Therapeutics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NORG, now defunct Seraphim System ^(talk) 03:07, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- according to the article they attempted to bring drugs to the market, which I take as they never did, so therefore a failure and not notable.--Rusf10 (talk) 04:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to David R. Liu. The article as it stands is uninformative, but I can imagine possible historical significance at some future date. Deb (talk) 12:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable per GNG, and not likely to become more notable as it is defunct. Natureium (talk) 07:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with OP, fails notability criteria, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 19:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete This a shitpile of industrial waste dumped into Wikipedia. There is one OK source and I have already added content based on it to David R. Liu. Jytdog (talk) 04:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above but please keep/put back the appropriate company-related categories on the resulting redirect page Doprendek (talk) 17:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.