Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engines and energy conversion laboratory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Engines and energy conversion laboratory

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2020/10 (see page history). Only source is their website, and I found no coverage online that meets WP:SIRS ARandomName123 (talk) 06:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Colorado. ARandomName123 (talk) 06:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Surprisingly enough I can't find anything truly independent despite reams of coverage, probably doesn't meet WP:ORG. Merge into a subsection of Colorado State University. That article already mentions it a few times. —siro χ o 07:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable: I found 3 journal refs - they were the first 3 Google Scholar hits using the link above. I've added them to the article. One of them is about the director but then it goes on to describe all that are happening at the lab. The other two are about the lab. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 20:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The NY Times, again via the link above:
- Witkin, Jim (16 December 2011). "Aspirations in Colorado to Be a New Motor City". The New York Times. Retrieved 27 July 2023.
A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 20:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: As far as I can tell, the sources found by A. B. are good enough for WP:NCOPR (also re. strict independence) and WP:GNG, so I don't see a lack of notability as a good reason for deletion. Given the impact of their research, I think it's fair to assume that there's also going to be some [[WP:NEXIST|sources we don't have access to]. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.