Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enfold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:01, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Enfold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article made by an editor who probably came for promoting this particular organization.

Fails WP:ORG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Raymond3023 (talk) 07:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, spam article. No independent sources, notability not established. – filelakeshoe (t / c)  09:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete - this is promotional and badly sourced; it would take a complete rewrite to make this is a WP article. A reason for speedy deletion is a valid deletion argument, and this is WP:G11 Jytdog (talk) 03:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.