Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enam Tugbefia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enam Tugbefia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Enam Tugbefia

Run-of-the-mill beauty contestant. This article was moved into draft space by User:Onel5969, and was then moved back into article space, so a second move to draft space would be move warring .

This article does not speak for itself and does not explain why the subject satisfies either the general notability guideline or any other notability guideline. The only credible claims of significance are finishing second in a beauty contest, and a controversy over vote-rigging in the beauty contest. The latter seems to be a living person known for one event, which can be covered in an article on the beauty contest, if the beauty contest is itself notable.

The article has been reference-bombed, and it should not be necessary to go through the sources to check on notability. However, reading the references shows that they are mostly about the 2019 beauty contest controversy.

This article is really about the beauty contest controversy. Either there should be an article about the beauty contest and the controversy, or there shouldn't; but the subject is clearly noted for one event. It appears that she or her flack are trying to use Wikipedia to advance her career by publicizing the controversy. The three conditions of BLP1E are all met. Either cover the controversy as a controversy, or don't cover it. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per nom; as above, references do not demonstrate notability. Eagleash (talk) 00:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per the exquisitely thorough presentation by the nom. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:07, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Hanging on a rope about one or two miles from Tenuous. Entirely non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 13:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.