Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empirical process (process control model)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Empirical process (process control model)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written. Poorly sourced. Unhelpful title. Rather than rescuing this article, it would be easier to create a new article at empirical process control. Yaris678 (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nom is right, this is poorly and very partially written (from a Scrum point of view). Whether there's anything here to add to existing articles, I rather doubt, but given the very poor sourcing (most paragraphs are totally unsourced, the rest partial in both senses), we aren't losing anything worth saving. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.