Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embodiment of Scarlet Devil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The required work to get to AfD does not seem to have been undertaken just yet for these articles as a collective. Some of the articles may be individually renominated, or may end up being merged or redirected individually, but consensus is in favour of keeping the entire group, in lieu of any more specific nominations. (non-admin closure) Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 22:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Embodiment of Scarlet Devil

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed to meet WP:DEL#7 and WP:DEL#8. Nightvour (talk) 02:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Nightvour (talk) 02:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because WP:DEL#7,WP:DEL#8:

Nightvour (talk) 02:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ambivalent, if not weak delete. While I understand that it's likely these pages may be deleted due to insignificant coverage in sources, the franchise itself is absolutely notable (Medium article, PC Gamer article 1, PC Gamer article 2). —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 05:22, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like it would be good to hear from some Japanese-speakers in this discussion. There may be japanese-language sources us non-speakers are missing. Also the Japanese-language articles seem better sourced, but I can't tell if the sources are of any value. ApLundell (talk) 06:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this content isn't notable (I haven't looked), there exists at least one redirect target. WP:ATD and all that. On the note of notability, mass nominations tend to drive people away from assessing each on its merits as should happen. Did the nominator perform a WP:BEFORE check? --Izno (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. They clearly meet WP:DEL#8 and the nominator has provided no indication that they have even attempted to find out if they meet WP:DEL#7. Some of them could possibly be merged and redirected into the main Touhou Project article, but that is not something that needs to concern AfD. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all for now. There are significant differences between these articles in quality, length, and number of references, so we really cannot make a decision to just delete all of them. The nominator should try to get consensus (on the relevant talk pages) to merge into Touhou Project on an article-by-article basis. Such a merge is probably the right course of action for the ones that don't cite any sources. PJvanMill (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.