Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emaze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:18, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emaze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This small company (10-15 employees) does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. The references do not support a claim of notability - they are routine articles that seem like they were just copied from press releases (one is press release itself). There also appears to be an aggressive bit of crosswiki promotion going on - the main contributors to the article are single-purpose accounts and the page has been repeatedly deleted on other language projects (w:es:emaze and w:pt:emaze for example). Deli nk (talk) 12:38, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 04:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 19:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: looks like an advertisement and single-purpose accounts prove that this is soapboxing. Ceosad (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : Universities and companies around the world use this service in multiple languages. Definitely has its place here. Gingimaster (talk) 21:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC) — Gingimaster (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. I see the claim of widespread use, but I see no evidence of it. DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches only found some passing mentions, clearly not yet notable and improvable. SwisterTwister talk 04:46, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.