Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsie Godwin

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elsie Godwin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References all seem to be blogs. Rathfelder (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article lacks reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. None of the sources cited are reliable. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 01:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we are a charity, not a a free resume web-host for personal profit. This clearly not notable person could have been excused in 2006, but not 2020. Bearian (talk) 02:32, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, lacks RS. Alex-h (talk) 10:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I saw a tweet under #Wikipedia linking to this AfD and asking to save this article, so adding not-a-vote template (even though all votes have thus-far been for deletion) in case off-wiki canvasing becomes a thing. SamHolt6 (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.