Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elimination Chamber (2012)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep per point 2. this comment and this comment suggest that the nominations are to disrupt process, as a way to "get back" at wikipedia for recent MMA nominations and deletions. Note to WP:PW, simply being a PPV does not automatically qualify an event as notable, this discussion may come back up in the future. --kelapstick(bainuu) 05:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
- Elimination Chamber (2012) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is not notable enough for wikipedia. Glock17gen4 (talk) 02:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this article. This article, along with every other WWE pay-per-view, is highly notable. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged or deleted from what I've read. Nevermind the nom itself isn't all-around well put together. Papacha (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.