Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli Hyder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:08, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eli Hyder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a WP:SPA, likely WP:COI. One claim to notability was being "a Counselor Of Justice in the American International Commercial Arbitration Court". That is a competely fake orgniasaiton based out of an accommodation address in London, which it shares (including the phone number) with an equally fake academic publisher run by a Russian national. This article has been edited by Russian IPs. I think this is spam and not notable. Guy (Help!) 20:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Obvious fake scam site is obvious. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:12, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is at best backed by press releases and employer bios, not indepdent, 3rd party sources about Hyder. He may as a shadowy figure move huge amounts of money, and may be one of the people key in the dark movmeent of money that has been chronicled in works like the Panama Papers. However, Wikipedia is built around verifiability, so unless we have 3rd party sources that verify Hyder is a truly notable person, we have to delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:57, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hurrygane (talk) 22:17, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Does not meet GNG. Kb.au (talk) 06:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot see anywhere near sufficient to even vaguely support WP:GNG. Aoziwe (talk) 12:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as insufficiently notable. SunChaser (talk) 01:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.