Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleonora Vera Sipos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 13:47, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eleonora Vera Sipos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. I find nothing that makes her notable. Nothing in NZ Herald, and only 1 gbooks hit. I searched under her assumed name as well. LibStar (talk) 15:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• comment there is a general consensus in WP:WPNZ that DNZB people are notable. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• keep a number of sources tin the DNZB article; a significant award; most of her work would have been done in non-English speaking countries prior to the all-digital age, so news sources hard to come by. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep don't ague with the New Zealand National Dictionary of Biography. Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Anyone with an entry in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography clearly meets WP:BIO Nick-D (talk) 03:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow Keep DNZB is more than enough. Neonchameleon (talk) 12:38, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.