Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electimize

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Electimize

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost entirely Original Research. Mainly based on the research and work of Ahmed Khalafallah and Abdel-Raheem Mohamed. WP:BEFORE only confirmed that the term and research around the term is done primarily by the duo. The google scholar profile will help to decide. Chirota (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 20:09, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clear attempt to use WP to bolster the subject's notability, rather than reflect it as would be appropriate. I'll eat my hat if this wasn't created by someone close to one or both of the authors of the cited sources. Fails notability, and largely OR per nom. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional content, the paper is cited 12 times. --hroest 00:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above, promotional content. Paper is cited repeatedly, no real notability here. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Almost the entire article seems to be written off of 3 papers published by the same people. There seems to be some duplicate references, if those are ignored the actual number of references should be 4. The only mentions of "Electimize" seem to be from papers written by Khalafallah Ahmed and Abdel-Raheem Mohamed, so I'm not too inclined to trust those. And these are barely cited, per other !votes. Plus, some of the article (especially the "Algorithm steps" section) is WP:OR. HoneycrispApples (talk) 06:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.