Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Green
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, blank article. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Eleanor Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Insufficiently notable movie character. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:32, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP - the article author has clearly marked the article as under construction (with the {{underconstruction}} template), and the last edit to this article is only 3 days prior to this nomination. - NDCompuGeek 08:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- And? This doesn't make the subject matter of the article notable. --Nlu (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- But a common general of some long-dead emperor is? If this article is in your sphere of knowledge, then give the author a chance to fully flesh out the article. Otherwise, why be so hasty in weilding the "delete it because I say it's not notable" sword? - NDCompuGeek 09:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You think that generals are not notable (as dead and as ancient they might be)? --Nlu (talk) 17:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- But a common general of some long-dead emperor is? If this article is in your sphere of knowledge, then give the author a chance to fully flesh out the article. Otherwise, why be so hasty in weilding the "delete it because I say it's not notable" sword? - NDCompuGeek 09:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- And? This doesn't make the subject matter of the article notable. --Nlu (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - Ozzykhan 19:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If fictional characters were within the scope of WP:CSD A7, this would be a speedy delete. It could still be a speedy under A1. As Nlu may know, I like to leave {{underconstruction}} tags on articles, and sometimes I forget to remove them. But this isn't so much under construction as never actually started. Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. -- Infrogmation 03:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.