Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterina Kruchkova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ekaterina Kruchkova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A photographer's CV. The claims made therein are modest, and/but unsourced. I wouldn't have thought that this merited an AfD (I'd have thought that a simpler method of disposal would suffice). However, I see that beside the autobiographer, a SPA, and various bots, a number of apparently disinterested humans have also taken the trouble to edit this article (even if only trivially), so presumably they took it seriously. -- Hoary (talk) 14:03, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 14:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 14:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I think a PROD would have done. CV, self-written; unsourced; no sign of RS on a google search, just self-publicity; nothing on a News search. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Competent professional, but no case for notability.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 05:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This vanity article exists solely to promote her professional credits and her studio. Fylbecatulous talk 12:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.