Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ek Khiladi Ek Haseena (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lepricavark (talk) 01:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ek Khiladi Ek Haseena (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Has no sources. » Shadowowl | talk 16:16, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:11, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NFILM a Bollywood film with two notable actors Feroz Khan and Fardeen Khan. Box office earnings of ( equivalent ₹27 crore or US$3.9 million in 2017) is notable. The movie is considered one of the notable works of the director [1][2] There are sources if you want to dig in. Movie is of 2005, so it will be a little tough. --DBig Xray 18:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep added references to establish notability. Inwind (talk) 07:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Additionally this film passes WP:FILM criteria 1 - "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." Either the nom doesn't understand WP:FILM or they didn't practice WP:BEFORE as stipulated in WP:AFD. Well, we know by their RfC of bot-tool generating over 150 AfDs that it was at least the latter. --Oakshade (talk) 01:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has reliable sources coverage such as the BBC Atlantic306 (talk) 20:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG. Source mentioned in RS is reliable. Accesscrawl (talk) 11:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NFILM.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.