Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eine warme Kartoffel ist ein warmes Bett (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eine warme Kartoffel ist ein warmes Bett

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One line, none notable book. Suggest redirecting to Herta Müller. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED . No references used. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:06, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:07, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies criteria 5 of the guideline WP:NBOOK. The author won a nobel prize for literature. You can't use an essay to reject a guideline, especially when the essay is garbage. James500 (talk) 17:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can easily merge it to the author's page. There's no references used in the article. Plus, there's no indication she won it on /that/ book. Plus the page is just a stub and tells nothing of the book. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 17:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the author's article. These micro bot-stubs do not serve a purpose. -- » Shadowowl | talk 12:40, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though this one's a little borderline. WP:NBOOKS #5 seems to apply and should establish notability, but as it's a fairly short collection of her columns, rather than a major cohesive work, it has less attention than her other books and sources aren't that easy to find. I've added some information to the article, so it's not as completely stubby as it was. I vote to leave it in. Mortee (talk) 15:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.