Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egg in beer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Egg in beer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~This is a definition, at best, but~~Wikipedia is not a dictionary. And there is already a definition in Wiktionary. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (originator): it's not simply a definition, it also includes a historical example. And sources exist to expand the article further, so concept is valid, and there is no deadline for expansion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:40, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded with more historical context. MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY and WP:ODD. It's been fixed up, and sourced better. We tend to keep such oddballs. Bearian (talk) 02:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as nominator (changing !vote from delete) per Bearian's remarks and the work done since the nom. The article has become better sourced and is now more than a mere definition. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 15:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty clear keep -- poor nomination: its actually a food item common in several cuisines. Sadads (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.