Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Top
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Edward Top
Conflict of interest and self-promotion -- MightyWarrior 23:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:VANITY, but without prejudice to recreation - if the awards Top has won are reasonably notable, he might meet the criterea for notability. --Hyperbole 23:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The wikis for the awards have just been created by the same editor, so it is currently not possible to judge their own importance. (I will tag the for notability). Tikiwont 14:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- Tikiwont 14:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This appears to be blatant self-promotion. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 00:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- strong keep or delete Oscar van Dillen (me) as well? ;-) greetz, oscar 17:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Addhoc 18:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above searches. Addhoc 18:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Press reviews would aid us in determining notability, but there are none. The article is not too helpful in describing his music: "Top's music is characterized by extreme contrasts; eloquence and inner expression are pivotal." It is hard to see any meaning at all in this kind of language. Surely something more definite can be said, or he could be compared to other classical composers who are better known. EdJohnston 00:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.