Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward L. Keithahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edward L. Keithahn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found four other books that he wrote, and the main one listed is in over 700 libraries (which is a lot considering that it's on a fairly obscure topic). It does indeed appear that it is a major book on totem poles. Some of his books seem to be based on native tales and have been included in compilations of native american tales. I found many mentions of him and his work in G-books. here here here and others. I am judging that if one had access to a good library on native Americans and especially Eskimos that it would be possible to fill out this stub. Unfortunately, I don't have that access, but I'll add what I can. (It helps to search on his first and last name, without the "L". I found the best stuff with that search.) LaMona (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if all of this suggests he's notable and acceptable. Notifying librarian DGG who will be interested to comment at this subject. SwisterTwister talk 07:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. the books are widely read, which make him an authority in his subject, according to WP:PROF. (it doesn't apply only to those with formal academic positions). DGG ( talk ) 08:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination Thanks to all for your comments, you've proved me wrong Boleyn (talk) 09:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.