Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:02, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edge Studio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. No in-depth or significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) No worthwhile redirect targets. czar 22:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - To paraphrase Bill Lumbergh, "if the company could be mentioned in the sources provided, that's be great." However, since it isn't, it fails GNG. MSJapan (talk) 01:32, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found this article at Backstage, and there are what looks like quite a few press releases at HighBeam Research, but I don't see significant coverage in independent reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.