Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EcoCheyenne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify as an alternative to deletion per WP:ATD-I, with the requirement that the article only be sent back to mainspace through AfC review after improvement Salvio ^giuliano 08:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EcoCheyenne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Folks sometimes confuse existence with notability. Was draftified, and returned to mainspace without any additional in-depth sourcing. Current sources do nothing but mention the organization. Or are primary. Or are unreliable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the only in-depth coverage I could find is https://cleantechnica.com/2021/11/04/native-led-indigenized-energy-initiative-seeks-to-decolonize-renewable-energy/. CleanTechnica isn’t a listed RS, and discussions in the RS Noticeboard suggest is somewhere between being not reliable and great caution type sourcing Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 290#Cleantechnica and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 295#CleanTechnica, again. So that is just one, questionably reliable, detailed source. Not enough.

Otherwise, I see a few scattered mentions like https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/23/opinions/sutter-coal-montana-two-degrees/index.html, but not enough to satisfy Wikipedia:ORG. Jo7hs2 (talk) 14:40, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify, with requirement that the article only be sent back to mainspace through AfC review. This is an obvious WikiEdu case, from a class that has had a bunch of deletions already ([1]). Term isn't over yet, so I strongly urge draftification over deletion for the sake of the student editor, who may still be working on it. -- asilvering (talk) 03:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.