Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebook scene

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ebook scene

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hopeless article, unreferenced and largely untouched since its creation in 2005. I can see that a hypothetical future article on "ebook piracy" might be of value, but none of the information here would be worth including or meet the guidelines of notability and verifiability. Ajbpearce (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a sad case of ESSAY, WP:OR. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing more dangerous than pirates armed with ebooks. But seriously, I don't see press about the "scene" as it related to ebooks. Likely because you don't have the equivalent of the MPAA and RIAA demonizing them, ironic as that might seem. Dennis Brown (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There probably could be an article written on ebook piracy, but this is not it. If it were salvageable, I'd suggest moving it and improving it, but I just don't see it. TJRC (talk) 02:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.