Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Front

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With Eastern Front (disambiguation) moved to Eastern Front after deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:28, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Front

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reasons as given at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Front. "Eastern front" just describes a fronts relative geography. There have been many fronts called "eastern" in history. This article is about only two of them. It is completely unreferenced and just summarises two other articles on the World War fronts. Eastern Front (disambiguation) should be moved to this title. Srnec (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the same reason I voted delete at Western Front. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nominator makes a valid argument that the term is too vague to be defined precisely. Sources like this one refer to WW2 but sources like this one refer to the Eastern front in Ukraine. Further, Wikipedia already has a disambiguation page here at Eastern Front (disambiguation). So the current article, treating the Eastern front from both WW1 and WW2 as the same, and not covering other Eastern fronts, is a bit of original research. If there is new material in the current article that is not included in other Wikipedia articles, perhaps it could be added to the other articles?--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.