Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EachNet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to eBay. selective merge at editorial discretion Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

EachNet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guidelines for companies. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.

Delete per nomination, a short-lived online auction business without any showing of significant effects on history, technology, or culture. All the information here could easily fit inside eBay, who bought it out, without undue emphasis. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
DON"T DELETESchool was a significant Brick & Morter 12,000 square foot institution that helped many unemplyed, underemployed and welfare recipients get well paying jobs in the casino industry...see Atlntic County's Job Training Partnership Act(JTPA) participating institutions 1986 circa.Isitme2 (talk)isitme2Isitme2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:20, 8 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Merge and redirect--Google news hits and Smerdis's arguments suggest that this is a notable enough search term for a merge and redirect. It may be a tiny little section in the eBay article--then again, 150 million is not a tiny little amount. Drmies (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.