Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXERD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 02:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EXERD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT. I searched for references myself, but couldn't find any non-affiliated ones. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 00:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability found. It is possible that some substantial Korean coverage may be found, in which case happy to revise my opinion, but I note that the equivalent Korean Wikipedia article is also unreferenced. AllyD (talk) 07:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. I'm not seeing any evidence that this is a notable tool. It exists, and that's great, but that does not mean that it is notable. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:08, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.