Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EQRIC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:33, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EQRIC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:MUSICBIO, at the moment the only chart success he's had has been on iTunes and Spotify. Can't find significant coverage of him in WP:Reliable sources, just passing mentions. Captain Calm (talk) 09:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 09:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 09:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with the nominator. The musician's numbers of hits in the various social media services are nice but not incredibly noteworthy when compared to everyone else, and some of the songs/videos touted in the article are in conjunction with other musicians. As an individual, this guy has not yet received enough significant and reliable music media coverage. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 15:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yes, and he was also aired on well known radio shows too and one of his remix went viral (how i got to know him), it got like 100M+ Streams on TikTok and 2M+ on YouTube. He is currently featured on Spotify's one of the biggest playlist too. btw, my friend also helped me write this article. btw, If you think the article isn't eligible, please let me know and you can put it to draft. Anyways, i still strongly believe he's famous tho. Thanks! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by D3FAULTX8 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hey, any updates? Thanks. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.58.235 (talk) 10:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Doomsdayer520. This music collaborator's minimal product — plenty in a table but unreferenced — fronted by others doesn't for me achieve notability for the subject, and is not written about in multiple reliable publications, but only in blogs, some self-referencing, and tracklist sites. Multi-views as a collaborator on Youtube and Spotify don't I think cut it... if these views were written about in multiple reliable nationally known sources there might be a case. 'Famous?' (above), i.e. part of most people's or Canadians' consciousness, certainly not... how would we then rate these notables: Persons of National Historic Significance. No, he's not notable enough for an article here. Acabashi (talk) 15:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable music producer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
verified on Instagram consider as notable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.77.182 (talk) 01:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Anyone can start an Instagram or other social media page, often not under their own name, so unreliable and/or self-serving. Acabashi (talk) 13:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.