Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMD BB40-2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to EMD SD40-2. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EMD BB40-2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plenty of photos and Youtubes about the EMD BB40-2, but no reliable secondary sources I could find. Fails WP:V. Since 2007. Rhadow (talk) 20:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to EMD SD40-2. As a rebuild it should be covered there. Has the nominator tried to find Portuguese-language (i.e. Brazilian) sources? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect is fine with me. I am happy to accept evidence in languages other than English. I reject the notion that an English language editor should have to do WP:BEFORE in random languages. Not in this case, but in another, I am told that it is obvious that references will be found in Sinhalese for articles unsupported for nine years. That's why I am sensitive. Rhadow (talk) 01:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- That's understandable, but the fact remains that if something is notable it's notable, regardless of the language that sources are in. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect - I can't find any significant sources either - but in this case we only need one. It apparently does exist, based on these photos.[[1]] TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect best outcome.L3X1 (distænt write) 01:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.