Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFR-Business Week

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus--an additional relist is not likely to come to any different conclusion DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EFR-Business Week (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - It sounds impressive, but the only news coverage I can find is a single press release and an article from a Dutch paper.--Calton | Talk 02:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.