Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EAST-NMR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EAST-NMR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about "a European Union research project" clearly fails WP:GNG. It has no references, and frankly, seems like some bureaucratic advert with no encyclopedic usefulness. Maybe part of the project money was spend on an intern who was told "and write this up on Wikipedia". This should have never been restored - or as soon as it was it should've speedied or taken here. That this spam survived four years in the mainspace... sigh. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article reads like pure advertising. It was written by the manager of the project ([1]) and it reads so much like a promotional brochure that I would not be surprised if it is simply copied from one. There are no independent sources in the article that support the notability of this topic, but if this topic is judged to be notable I think WP:TNT would apply. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.