Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.Bon Holdings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 00:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

E.Bon Holdings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a minor, albeit public corporation, but the article has literally no sources, and there's not much a reason for it to exist. LikeMeercats (talk) 21:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. 企管達人 (2017-12-22). "企管達人——怡邦行優質家具贏口碑拒絕「做爛市」". Sing Tao Daily (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2018-11-04. Retrieved 2018-11-04.
2. 王晓易, ed. (2013-11-04). "怡邦行：二代接班人的"弹性"改革". Forbes China. Archived from the original on 2018-11-04. Retrieved 2018-11-04 – via NetEase.
3. "怡邦行集團以誠為本嚴選頂尖品牌穩中求勝". Hong Kong Economic Journal. 2013-10-31. Archived from the original on 2018-11-04. Retrieved 2018-11-04.
  This is an excerpt. The full text is 1,452 words and is available on a subscription basis.
4. 鄺建揚 (2018-07-18). "怡邦行(599)". Centaline Securities. Archived from the original on 2018-11-04. Retrieved 2018-11-04.
  According to http://www.centasec.com/, Centaline Securities is a securities firm and its parent company is Centaline Holdings. This article confirms that the firm publishes research on 怡邦行 for its customers. From Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Publicly traded corporations, analyst reports can be used to establish notability.
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow E. Bon Holdings to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 00:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources provided by Cunard. These are reliable Chinese-language sources that can be used to establish WP:GNG. feminist (talk) 12:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.