Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Hobby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:25, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

E-Hobby

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, no references, two of the article's three sentences appear to be WP:OR. HalJor (talk) 01:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 01:36, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:31, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:40, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - couldn't find any refs that satisfied both Sig Cov, independent and WP:ROUTINE so notability demonstrated. The three lines there are some blend of WP:OR and advertorial. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Virtually no edits since creation 10+ years ago, no refs, they paint transformers and sell them online. Szzuk (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.