Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamix II

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamix II

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC criteria, no major releases on notable label. Also fails WP:GNG. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable for stand alone article and no notable releases or any sufficient independent sourcing. Local, trivial. Kierzek (talk) 13:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.