Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Black
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dylan Black (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No claim to notability, lack of verifiable third party references. I PRODed this back in May, the PROD was removed by the article creator (diff) so I proposed a merger instead. However, the lack of references makes it a poor candidate for merging, so I'm bringing it here. L'Aquatique[happyfourth !] 18:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —L'Aquatique[happyfourth !] 18:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No independent verifiable references Dreamspy (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Purely local radio personalities are rarely, if ever, sufficiently verifiable or notable to merit their own articles. Bearcat (talk) 15:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no reliable sources to indicate notability -- Whpq (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks reliable sources to verify/indicate notability. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.