Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duotrope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:29, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duotrope

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 12:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, at exactly the same time I was tagging this for AfD, creator User:Rick Norwood indicated plans to start working on this article in a week's time to establish its notability. I think this should be taking into account in not closing the discussion quickly. Boleyn (talk) 12:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it stands. If notability is established, then we'll have to see how it stands. CesareAngelotti (talk) 22:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't appear to pass our web guidelines at this time. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:38, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.