Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duckmandu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:24, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duckmandu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable performer. Even the provided references link to either unreliable sources or very trivial mentions. Fails the guidelines for inclusion by a long margin Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

keep - mostly because i prepared most of the keepable parts of the article, however he was always going to be on the edge of independent notability. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 03:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Per rocksanddirt. Chutznik (talk) 02:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you show which references you believe demonstrates the subjects notability? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 02:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable and one of the sources is "personal communication!!" MiRroar (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:44, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've found a couple of passing mentions, a couple of completely trivial mentions, and this article, in which he is only described together with his co-composer as "Seeman/Spigelbaum." I can't conclude that Duckmandu has been the "subject of multiple non-trivial published works," or otherwise that he meets WP:MUSICBIO. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not appear to pass WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only third party RS are for one production that lasted two nights. the Monsters of Accordion tour in a local paper (as are the other two), no national coverage. However if better sources are found this would change.Slatersteven (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.