Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubashi

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dubashi

Dubashi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent. JMHamo (talk) 19:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Have added significant coverage in major Indian dailies. Coverage that continued years after the film opened.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here: [1] my search on Hariharan + Dubashi at theHindu.com. Other Indian papers also covered this film.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go  21:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go  21:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep seems to pass NFILM after edits, but Indian cinema isn't one of my interests so I did not dig much deeper.Bahb the Illuminated (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The article at present mentions several reliable references.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.